SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOMINANT TYPES OF ENTOMOPHAGES IN FRUIT ORCHARDS

Authors

  • М.К. Раkhmanova Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan
  • К.Q. Khamdamov Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan
  • U. Rasulova Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan
  • G. Turdiyeva, Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan
  • G. Rahmonova Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan
  • R. Saliyeva Tashkent Agrarian University, Andijan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v22i2.498

Keywords:

orchard, pest entomophage, entomofauna, parasites, areal, type, family

Abstract

The    formation      of        entomophauna         in        orchards        and            their  development has a great importance, and it greatly influences to the number of phitofags. During our observations of entomophages orchard in agrobiocenosis  indentified  24 dominant types which belong to seven families. Moveover, researches of entomophages show 24 dominant types which belong to 7 families. Besides that we have analysed the share of entomophage varieties concerning the entomophages

References

Craumer, P. (1995). Rural and agricultural development in Uzbekistan. Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19986771299

Dennis, E., Ilyasov, J., van Dusen, E., Treshkin, S., Lee, M., & Eyzaguirre, P. (2007). Local

Institutions and Plant Genetic Conservation: Exchange of Plant Genetic Resources in

Rural Uzbekistan and some Theoretical Implications. World Development, 35(9), 1564–

1578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.05.022

Egamberdieva, D., Kamilova, F., … S. V.-E., & 2008, undefined. (n.d.). High incidence of plant growth stimulating bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of wheat grown on salinated soil in Uzbekistan. Wiley Online Library. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01424.x/full

Kalpakjian, S., & Schmid, S. (2014). Manufacturing engineering and technology. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vijay_Sekar2/publication/262156319_Manu facturing_Engineering_and_Technology/links/00b49536c9c352428b000000.pdf

Reisinger, Y., & Turner, L. (1998). Journal of Travel & Tourism Cross-Cultural Differences in Tourism : A Strategy for Tourism Marketers. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing,

7(4), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v07n04

Sauvach A.Kh., Musolin D.L. Biology and ecology of parasitic hymenoptera

(Hymeneptera: Apocrita: Parasitica). St. Petersburg. 2013.-p3.

Sauvach A.H., Musolin D.L. Biology and Ecology of pest hymenoptera (Hymeneptera: Apocrita: Parasitica). St. Petersburg. 2013.-p.3

Koladeva L.M. Key to harmful and beneficial insects and ticks of fruit and berry crops in Leningrad. "Spike" 1984. P. 32-33.

Sternshchis M.V., Dzhalilov U., Andreeva I.V., Tomilova O.G. Biological protection of the plant "Kolos" -Moscow: 2004. p. 101.

Khamraev A.Sh., Nasriddinov K. Biological protection of plants. Publication of People's Heritage. Tashkent 2003. 212 p.

Thomas, K., Thanopoulos, R., Knüpffer, H., & Bebeli, P. J. (2013). Plant genetic resources in a touristic island: The case of Lefkada (Ionian Islands, Greece). Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 60(8), 2431–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-013-0011-3

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Раkhmanova М., Khamdamov К., Rasulova, U., Turdiyeva, G., Rahmonova, G., & Saliyeva, R. (2022). SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF THE DOMINANT TYPES OF ENTOMOPHAGES IN FRUIT ORCHARDS. Pelita : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 22(2), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.33592/pelita.v22i2.498